<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fanny's Clicker Dog Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fannygott.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fannygott.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Some of my Thoughts on Shaping by Langwell1828@gmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/some-of-my-thoughts-on-shaping#comment-7171</link>
		<dc:creator>Langwell1828@gmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=107#comment-7171</guid>
		<description>Good day. Initial I would like to say that I genuinely like your blog, just determined it last week but I've been following it ever since then. 

I seem to acknowledge with most of your thinkings and beliefs and this post is no different. completely 

Thank you to get a excellent blog and I hope you preserve up the great perform. If you do I will keep on to browse through it. 

Use a wonderful evening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day. Initial I would like to say that I genuinely like your blog, just determined it last week but I&#8217;ve been following it ever since then. </p>
<p>I seem to acknowledge with most of your thinkings and beliefs and this post is no different. completely </p>
<p>Thank you to get a excellent blog and I hope you preserve up the great perform. If you do I will keep on to browse through it. </p>
<p>Use a wonderful evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Foundations For a Great Retrieve by Enola Krasnici</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/foundations-for-a-great-retrieve#comment-7129</link>
		<dc:creator>Enola Krasnici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=87#comment-7129</guid>
		<description>Fantastic posting, I bookmarked your blog so I can visit again in the future, All the Best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic posting, I bookmarked your blog so I can visit again in the future, All the Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clicker Training Heeling by Sharla Brox</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/clicker-training-heeling#comment-7086</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharla Brox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=69#comment-7086</guid>
		<description>Lots of Good information in your posting, I bookmarked your blog so I can visit again in the near future, All the Best, Sharla Brox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of Good information in your posting, I bookmarked your blog so I can visit again in the near future, All the Best, Sharla Brox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some videos by DogNerd</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/some-videos#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>DogNerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=110#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>I get such inspiration from watching all your videos! They really help me get off my lazy butt and train my dog even when I'd rather not. 
I do have a question for you...what breeder did you get Pogue and Shejpa from? I'm looking into getting a working cocker as my next dog and am currently very much in the research stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get such inspiration from watching all your videos! They really help me get off my lazy butt and train my dog even when I&#8217;d rather not.<br />
I do have a question for you&#8230;what breeder did you get Pogue and Shejpa from? I&#8217;m looking into getting a working cocker as my next dog and am currently very much in the research stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adding a Cue by Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/adding-a-cue#comment-7032</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=109#comment-7032</guid>
		<description>I like your reasoning! In the past I've usually added the cue just as the dog begins the behaviour, but not usually before. It's never really been something that I've thought a lot about. Next time I'll try adding the cue before the behaviour, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your reasoning! In the past I&#8217;ve usually added the cue just as the dog begins the behaviour, but not usually before. It&#8217;s never really been something that I&#8217;ve thought a lot about. Next time I&#8217;ll try adding the cue before the behaviour, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adding a Cue by Laura, Lance, and Vito</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/adding-a-cue#comment-7031</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura, Lance, and Vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=109#comment-7031</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%!  I never add a cue until I'm happy with the behavior.  And then I add it right before I think the dog is going to do it.  

I also think that saying "good sit" after the dog has sat is completely ridiculous.  I think dog's view cues as actions not as positions, so "good sit" would be viewed as praise and then another cue to sit again, which the dog can't do since his butt is already on the ground!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%!  I never add a cue until I&#8217;m happy with the behavior.  And then I add it right before I think the dog is going to do it.  </p>
<p>I also think that saying &#8220;good sit&#8221; after the dog has sat is completely ridiculous.  I think dog&#8217;s view cues as actions not as positions, so &#8220;good sit&#8221; would be viewed as praise and then another cue to sit again, which the dog can&#8217;t do since his butt is already on the ground!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Training tip #1 - Adding a New Cue by Adding a Cue at Fanny&#8217;s Clicker Dog Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/training-tip-1-adding-a-new-cue#comment-7028</link>
		<dc:creator>Adding a Cue at Fanny&#8217;s Clicker Dog Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=93#comment-7028</guid>
		<description>[...] the behavior, or after the behavior (just before the click and/or reward). As I pointed out in this post last summer, I choose to add the cue before the behavior. It just makes much more sense to me than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the behavior, or after the behavior (just before the click and/or reward). As I pointed out in this post last summer, I choose to add the cue before the behavior. It just makes much more sense to me than [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is shaping for all dogs? by Tricia</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/is-shaping-for-all-dogs#comment-6961</link>
		<dc:creator>Tricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=106#comment-6961</guid>
		<description>Sorry I have come to this discussion a little late.  I think the real issue between shaping Vs luring is as Susan Garrett says.  With luring the value stays with the lure and never transfers to the behaviour.  Shaping encourages the dog to see value in the behaviour, so from my point of view I want to see my dogs enjoying the learning process and loving to perform a behaviour rather than totally focusing on the lure.  I have seen so many dogs in classes whose handlers complain that they will do nothing unless they can see the lure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I have come to this discussion a little late.  I think the real issue between shaping Vs luring is as Susan Garrett says.  With luring the value stays with the lure and never transfers to the behaviour.  Shaping encourages the dog to see value in the behaviour, so from my point of view I want to see my dogs enjoying the learning process and loving to perform a behaviour rather than totally focusing on the lure.  I have seen so many dogs in classes whose handlers complain that they will do nothing unless they can see the lure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is shaping for all dogs? by Marge Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/is-shaping-for-all-dogs#comment-6712</link>
		<dc:creator>Marge Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=106#comment-6712</guid>
		<description>Good point about the research.  I was just rereading Pamela Reid's "Excel-erated Learning" when I posted my comments.  When contrasting prompting and shaping (p.141), she says, "The dog will not learn any differently than if you had shaped the behavior.  Some people are under the impression that shaped responses are learned 'better' or retained longer than prompted responses.  There is absolutely no evidence to support this view."  I was trying to summarize that statement in comments.  I hope I did not mislead.  Also, my comment on "give it a try" comes right after my statement on luring. I intended to say "give shaping a try."  That's what I get for commented late at night.  :-)  If I wasn't clear above - I love shaping.  We shape dogs all the time, whether we know it or not.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the research.  I was just rereading Pamela Reid&#8217;s &#8220;Excel-erated Learning&#8221; when I posted my comments.  When contrasting prompting and shaping (p.141), she says, &#8220;The dog will not learn any differently than if you had shaped the behavior.  Some people are under the impression that shaped responses are learned &#8216;better&#8217; or retained longer than prompted responses.  There is absolutely no evidence to support this view.&#8221;  I was trying to summarize that statement in comments.  I hope I did not mislead.  Also, my comment on &#8220;give it a try&#8221; comes right after my statement on luring. I intended to say &#8220;give shaping a try.&#8221;  That&#8217;s what I get for commented late at night.  <img src='http://www.fannygott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  If I wasn&#8217;t clear above - I love shaping.  We shape dogs all the time, whether we know it or not.  <img src='http://www.fannygott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is shaping for all dogs? by Fanny</title>
		<link>http://www.fannygott.com/is-shaping-for-all-dogs#comment-6707</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fannygott.com/?p=106#comment-6707</guid>
		<description>Marge: Could you guide me to the research made on luring vs. shaping? I haven't seen any research of that kind and I would love to see it. I love science based training, but you must never buy what research says until you know exactly what they have researched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marge: Could you guide me to the research made on luring vs. shaping? I haven&#8217;t seen any research of that kind and I would love to see it. I love science based training, but you must never buy what research says until you know exactly what they have researched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
